Within the weeks following the North Atlantic Treaty Group (NATO) summit in Vilnius, a seemingly informal remark by NATO Secretary Basic Jens Stoltenberg’s chief of workers, Stian Jenssen, ignited a short firestorm of controversy. Talking at a convention in Norway in mid-August, Jenssen recommended that Ukraine’s membership within the North Atlantic Alliance may require giving up a few of its territory to Russia to finish the conflict. Predictably, Jenssen’s feedback deeply annoyed the Ukrainian authorities. Overseas Minister Dmytro Kuleba promptly made it clear that Ukraine is not going to think about giving up its territory on the expense of becoming a member of NATO. The adviser to the President’s Workplace, Mykhailo Podolyak, merely known as the suggestion ridiculous. Regardless of Jenssen’s subsequent apology and assurances from different NATO officers that the Alliance stays firmly dedicated to Ukraine’s territorial integrity, the nation’s prospects for membership nonetheless stay unclear.
The Ukrainian authorities is mired in strategic ambiguity and is more and more looking for stable safety ensures that may guarantee lasting peace and deterrence towards renewed Russian aggression as soon as the conflict ends and till Ukraine joins NATO. Kiev has discovered a tough lesson from Russia’s full disregard for its obligations below the Budapest Memorandum, which was imagined to function the principle worldwide instrument to ensure Ukraine’s territorial integrity and sovereignty. In 1994, the Russian Federation, the UK and the US dedicated themselves to it Amongst different issues to respect Ukraine’s current borders and chorus from threats or use of pressure in trade for giving up any claims to Soviet-era nuclear weapons remaining on its territory, which might have made Ukraine the world’s third largest nuclear energy. Since then, nonetheless, Russia has constantly undermined Ukrainian sovereignty in each militarily overt and “hybrid” methods, culminating within the full-scale invasion launched in February 2022.
Just lately, President Volodymyr Zelensky’s chief of workers, Andriy Yermak, acknowledged that Kiev had begun consultations with Washington on offering safety ensures to Ukraine. Yermak shortly adopted that up with one other assertion indicating that related negotiations have been underway with London in an effort to have safety preparations in place by the top of the yr. And some days in the past, Ukrainian Protection Minister Rustem Umerov met with US Secretary of Protection Lloyd Austin to debate, amongst different issues, arms help and Ukraine’s safety ensures. These proactive bilateral steps with key Western supporters adopted the result of the NATO summit in Vilnius, the place Ukrainian expectations of a proper invitation or particular timetable to hitch the Alliance didn’t materialize.
The wording of the ultimate joint communiqué of the Vilnius Summit sparked a lot controversy, although an invite to Ukraine to hitch NATO was by no means on the agenda. Broadly talking, allies appeared to agree that Ukraine may solely be part of NATO after the conflict with Russia was over. US Nationwide Safety Advisor Jake Sullivan clearly reiterated this place on the NATO Public Discussion board. In accordance with Sullivan, Ukraine’s entry into the Alliance, whereas the battle continues, would mechanically imply that NATO was all of a sudden at conflict with Russia. Regardless of allies’ unity and renewed pledges to assist Ukraine for so long as essential, NATO has constantly reiterated that it’s not instantly engaged in a conflict with Moscow. Thus, the one comparatively clear situation that Ukraine obtained on the Vilnius Summit was that the accession course of couldn’t start till the conflict was over.
The anomaly of the language within the remaining communique echoes the 2008 Bucharest Summit, the place allies agreed that Ukraine (and Georgia) would finally be part of NATO, however didn’t present a timetable. Since then, false beliefs that it’s potential to dwell peacefully with Vladimir Putin’s Russia have develop into a factor of the previous. Following the Bucharest Summit, Russia invaded Georgia in August 2008, annexed Crimea, unleashed a so-called “separatist” conflict in jap Ukraine within the spring of 2014, and is now waging a genocidal conflict of conquest towards Ukraine. The dearth of any safety ensures for Ukraine since Bucharest inspired Putin to pursue his formidable objectives. The one type of deterrence that has undoubtedly halted Putinist Russia’s revanchist army operations within the area is NATO’s Article V collective safety umbrella. Regardless of quite a few reckless threats and aggressive rhetoric towards various frontline NATO members, Putin has to date all the time behaved beneath the Article V threshold in the direction of these states.
Russian officers have repeatedly warned Finland and Sweden towards becoming a member of NATO and promised severe army and political penalties would observe. The Deputy Chairman of the Russian Safety Council, Dmitry Medvedev, even went as far as to threaten that Moscow would place nuclear weapons nearer to the borders of Finland and Sweden. Nonetheless, the most effective protection towards any potential Russian menace is exactly to hitch the Alliance and be lined by Article V safety. Recognizing this, Helsinki and Stockholm modified their long-standing coverage of non-alignment and determined to hunt NATO membership as quickly as potential; Finland was admitted to Vilnius, whereas Sweden will be part of as soon as Turkey completes its ratification course of.
The Vilnius Summit theoretically shortened Ukraine’s path to NATO by eliminating the requirement for a Membership Motion Plan (MAP). And allies agreed to ascertain a NATO-Ukraine Council to assist Ukraine’s Euro-Atlantic integration and to enhance coordination between Alliance members and Ukraine on an equal stage. As well as, the current summit led to elevated commitments in army and monetary help; On the similar time, G7 nations introduced long-term bilateral safety commitments for Ukraine. However as necessary as it’s for Ukraine to work with particular person companions and obtain their long-term assist, a very powerful safety assure for Ukraine can solely be NATO and its Article V umbrella. No settlement aside from full NATO membership will fully eradicate the specter of Russian reinvasion, not less than so long as Putin stays in energy.
So regardless of justified disappointment over the shortage of readability on accession, Zelenskiy nonetheless managed to get some tangible outcomes from the Vilnius Summit. However with the membership dilemma nonetheless unresolved, combined messages from NATO officers, corresponding to Jenssen’s aforementioned remark, should not serving to. Medvedev shortly responded with derision, saying that as a way to be part of the Alliance, Ukraine should quit Kiev itself – “the capital of previous Russia.” [sic].” So long as Russia believes that NATO membership is a distant prospect for Ukraine, it would attempt to inflict as a lot injury on Ukraine as potential till Kiev surrenders and the West loses its nerve. Safety ensures and bilateral protection cooperation frameworks with Western allies are necessary, however the one long-term sustainable technique of securing Ukraine is full NATO membership.
Natia Seskuria is an affiliate fellow on the Royal United Providers Institute (RUSI) and was beforehand a fellow at MEI’s Black Sea Program.
Picture by Artur Widak/NurPhoto through Getty Photos
The Center East Institute (MEI) is an unbiased, non-partisan, non-profit academic group. It doesn’t interact in advocacy and the opinions of its students are their very own. MEI welcomes monetary donations, however retains unique editorial management over its work and its publications mirror solely the opinions of the authors. For an inventory of MEI donors, click on here.