The Al Ain Courtroom of First Occasion dominated {that a} man needed to pay a dealer 14,980 dirhams, the worth of the remainder of the value of oil, cleaning soap and shampoo.
Intimately, a dealer filed a lawsuit in opposition to a person, demanding that he pay him the quantity of 13,980 dirhams, and in compensation 2,000 dirhams with a authorized curiosity of 12% till full cost, and obliged him to pay charges and prices to pay. , noting that the accused purchased blankets, shampoo, cleaning soap, oil, and so on. from him. An settlement was drawn up between them and after six months had elapsed from the date of creating the contract, the defendant paid a part of the quantity, and the quantity claimed remained, whereas the defendant didn’t attend the case, regardless of being on had been notified as offered by legislation.
The courtroom defined within the substance of its ruling that an examination of the contract in help of the declare clearly exhibits that the plaintiff is entitled to the sum of 34,000 dirhams for the home items bought from him by the defendant and bearing the signature of bear its issuance. attributed to the defendant and never disputed in any method, and subsequently it’s an argument in opposition to him for the quantities acknowledged therein. Noting that the plaintiff determined in his assertion of declare that the defendant paid a part of the quantity, and an quantity Of the whole quantity acknowledged within the declare doc contract remained for him 13 thousand and 980 dirhams, and subsequently it’s established earlier than the courtroom that the legal responsibility of the latter is roofed by the previous with the quantity claimed.
The courtroom directed that the defendant has not appeared, both personally or by means of an agent on his behalf, regardless of his authorized discover, to defend the go well with with any plea or protection he could have, and that he has not confirmed earlier than the courtroom that he was launched from the quantity claimed, as long as the pending go well with was legitimate and confirmed, and the plaintiff should reply the declare, his request and his judgment in opposition to the defendant for the quantity claimed.
Relating to the request for damages within the quantity of two,000 dirhams, the courtroom identified that it had been confirmed that the defendant had failed to meet his obligation to pay the rest of the worth of the quantity acknowledged within the contract, which constitutes an error that results in legal responsibility in the direction of him. On account of the seizure of his cash from the defendant, the plaintiff has suffered damages represented within the earnings and what he has misplaced. He suffered injury as a result of he didn’t profit from the quantity, and due to the grief and unhappiness that occurred to him. The courtroom considers the quantity of 1,000 dirhams as compensation for all damages. The courtroom guidelines that the defendant must be ordered to pay the plaintiff 14,000 dirhams, relying on the explanations and prices, and rejects all different requests.
• It’s confirmed that the defendant has failed to meet his obligation to pay the rest of the quantity stipulated within the contract.
Comply with our newest native and sports activities information and the newest political and financial developments by way of Google information
