The Civil Courtroom of First Occasion of Ras Al Khaimah dominated that an Asian man was obliged to pay 7,000 dirhams to an Arab lady on expenses of defaming her, insulting her honor and attributing shameful acts to her. The suspect knowledgeable his pal that the lady had dedicated shameful acts, and the latter knowledgeable the fiancée of the plaintiff’s sister about what he heard in regards to the violation of her honor, whereupon she filed a criticism in opposition to her.
Intimately, the plaintiff filed a civil lawsuit during which she demanded that the defendant pay her 20,000 dirhams in compensation for the fabric and non-pecuniary injury she had suffered, and that he be obliged to pay the charges, bills and legal professional’s charges of the lawsuit pay. compensation, based mostly on the abuse dedicated in opposition to her by the suspect and the distortion of her status, which affected her son.
The case paperwork added that the defendant filed a memorandum of response recording the malice within the prison report, and that the incident talked about by the plaintiff dates again 4 years, and that she has not been subjected to any materials or ethical injury for which she has a proper. He demanded that the lawsuit be dismissed because of lack of validity and proof and lack of authorized assist.
He identified that he had no sum of money to compensate the plaintiff and requested her to chorus from doing so.
In response to the suspect’s assertion, the plaintiff defined that the latter had been criminally convicted with a sentence for his conduct during which he insulted chaste girls and violated her honor and honour, and that he admitted this and witnesses testified, and he or she requested a ruling in her favor.
The ruling of the Civil Courtroom of First Occasion of Ras Al Khaimah states that the plaintiff has suffered ethical injury and that there’s a causal hyperlink between the dangerous truth and the injury, and that the civil courtroom is certain by what the prison courtroom has concluded by proving the suspect’s guilt. fault, and it stays for the civil courtroom to train its discretion in inspecting the weather of the injury claimed and figuring out the damages due.
She identified that there isn’t a doubt that the prison act dedicated by the suspect was for which he was convicted for accusing the sufferer of insulting her honor and dignity, uttering indecent phrases and informing his pal about them, subsequent to the testimony. of one other individual about it, which is an act that’s immoral and violates her dignity and honor. The request for compensation for ethical damages arrives and the courtroom decides to oblige the defendant to pay 7,000 dirhams to the plaintiff.
He added that with regard to the request for compensation for materials injury, for the reason that authentic burden of proof of the fabric injury lies with the plaintiff and it’s not enough to show the defendant’s fault, the plaintiff should current the weather of the fabric injury which it claims have to be confirmed. of the losses she suffered or the prices she incurred, which the plaintiff has not confirmed, her declare stays devoid of any proof, and the judgment is directed to dismiss the case on this regard.
Comply with our newest native and sports activities information and the most recent political and financial developments through Google information